C-CNDSV01 (Apr 18, 1996)
Puzzle
“S.V.”
See: C-CND11 | 2 Words
Clue
Hover over the clues if you require!
Clue 1: Who is S.V.?
Answer and Explanation
Answer: Sofia Vargas
Explanation: In C-CND11, it talks about an employee from the Cafe No Diner which fits S.V. It is Sofia Vargas, Xavier’s sister.
Summary of Receipt
Summary
Transcript
RECEIPT #001
FILED UNDER: CAFE-CNDSV
DATE: 4/1E/96
EMPLOYEE #17
Sofia Vargas? Well, that is an interesting connection, isn’t it? The Cafe No Diner’s files were a bit brief for my liking, so I did some digging into S.V. on my own. She was born and raised in the general Long Beach area. From a young age, she displayed an exceptional aptitude for analysis and problem-solving. However, she was deemed a “problem child” by many of her elementary school teachers and scraped by until eventually dropping out of school altogether at 17. Interestingly enough, she dropped out of the same high school our very own #53 dropped out of. Small world.
Despite not finishing high school, Sofia has advanced analytical skills and is likely proficient in cryptographic techniques and potentially information security as well. While I don’t believe making your name a password is considered best practice, it’s possible she had no say in how the Employee Information was set up in the CND’s ZOTZ system. Despite the negative information gleaned from her teachers, a few mentioned that she could be rather focused, perceptive, and even quietly confident when she wanted to be. It would seem that her poor performance in school likely stemmed from a mismatch of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators. If I had to guess.
Lastly, her files mention that her “Anathema” is the Redman, and her goal is to kill him. What an oddly precise word. I suppose anathema does mean a vehement dislike—but why use that word to describe it? Could the Cafe No Diner know more about the Open Doors Church than they let on? Again, I must circle back to their familiarity and knowledge of Padre’s daughter, Abigail—“Abby.” Even so, using the word “anathema” here does not match our current understanding of the Anathema Proxy clause, so perhaps it is merely a coincidence or tongue-in-cheek.
Nothing is ever a coincidence, though, is it?